From: Jérémie Galarneau Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 00:27:31 +0000 (-0500) Subject: Fix: consumerd: use-after-free of metadata bucket X-Git-Tag: v2.13.5~14 X-Git-Url: https://git.liburcu.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=18acc0a479471e15fb7b7fc3ca5f38e7ce8f72d3;hp=18acc0a479471e15fb7b7fc3ca5f38e7ce8f72d3;p=lttng-tools.git Fix: consumerd: use-after-free of metadata bucket Observed issue ============== When consumer_stream_destroy() is called from, for example, the error path in setup_metadata(), consumer_stream_free() can end up being called twice on the same stream. Since the stream->metadata_bucket is not set to NULL after being destroyed, it leads to a use-after-free: ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x604000000318 READ of size 8 at 0x604000000318 thread T7 #0 in metadata_bucket_destroy #1 in consumer_stream_free #2 in consumer_stream_destroy #3 in setup_metadata #4 in lttng_ustconsumer_recv_cmd #5 in lttng_consumer_recv_cmd #6 in consumer_thread_sessiond_poll #7 in start_thread nptl/pthread_create.c:481 #8 in clone (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0xfcbde) 0x604000000318 is located 8 bytes inside of 48-byte region [0x604000000310,0x604000000340) freed by thread T7 here: #0 in __interceptor_free #1 in metadata_bucket_destroy #2 in consumer_stream_free #3 in consumer_stream_destroy #4 in clean_channel_stream_list #5 in consumer_del_channel #6 in consumer_stream_destroy #7 in setup_metadata #8 in lttng_ustconsumer_recv_cmd #9 in lttng_consumer_recv_cmd #10 in consumer_thread_sessiond_poll #11 in start_thread nptl/pthread_create.c:481 previously allocated by thread T7 here: #0 in __interceptor_calloc #1 in zmalloc #2 in metadata_bucket_create #3 in consumer_stream_enable_metadata_bucketization #4 in lttng_ustconsumer_set_stream_ops #5 in lttng_ustconsumer_on_recv_stream #6 in lttng_consumer_on_recv_stream #7 in create_ust_streams #8 in ask_channel #9 in lttng_ustconsumer_recv_cmd #10 in lttng_consumer_recv_cmd #11 in consumer_thread_sessiond_poll #12 in start_thread nptl/pthread_create.c:481 Thread T7 created by T0 here: #0 in __interceptor_pthread_create #1 in main #2 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:332 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free in metadata_bucket_destroy This can be easily reproduced by forcing a failure during the setup of the metadata reproducible using the following change: diff --git a/src/common/ust-consumer/ust-consumer.c b/src/common/ust-consumer/ust-consumer.c index fa1c71299..97ed59632 100644 --- a/src/common/ust-consumer/ust-consumer.c +++ b/src/common/ust-consumer/ust-consumer.c @@ -908,8 +908,7 @@ static int setup_metadata(struct lttng_consumer_local_data *ctx, uint64_t key) /* Send metadata stream to relayd if needed. */ if (metadata->metadata_stream->net_seq_idx != (uint64_t) -1ULL) { - ret = consumer_send_relayd_stream(metadata->metadata_stream, - metadata->pathname); + ret = -1; if (ret < 0) { ret = LTTCOMM_CONSUMERD_ERROR_METADATA; goto error; Cause ===== Channels have a list of streams that are being "setup" and are not yet monitored for consumption. During this setup phase, the streams are owned by the channel. On destruction of the channel, any stream in that list will thus be cleaned-up. When destroying a consumer stream, a reference to its channel is 'put'. This can result in the destruction of the channel. In the situation described above, the release of the channel's reference is done before the stream is removed from the channel's stream list. This causes the channel's clean-up to invoke (again) the current stream's clean-up, resulting in the double-free of the metadata bucket. This problem is present in a number of error paths. Solution ======== Some error paths already manually removed the consumer stream from it's channel's stream list before invoking consumer_stream_destroy(). The various error paths that have to deal with this possible situation are changed to simply invoke consumer_stream_destroy(). consumer_stream_destroy() is modified to always remove the stream from its channel's list before performing the rest of the clean-up. This ensures that those double clean-ups can't occur. Drawbacks ========= None. Reported-by: Vincent Whitchurch Tested-by: Vincent Whitchurch Signed-off-by: Jérémie Galarneau Change-Id: Ibeca9b675b86fc46be3f57826f7158de4da43df8 ---