installing-lttng: update alternatives for Fedora

[lttng-docs.git] / 2.8 / lttng-docs-2.8.txt

diff --git a/2.8/lttng-docs-2.8.txt b/2.8/lttng-docs-2.8.txt
index e72fc38aa114a5d21152feb23ae431fa28a2b1ef..749776c070e48eb7a406acf15e67e1ee3f2f5748 100644 (file)
--- a/2.8/lttng-docs-2.8.txt
+++ b/2.8/lttng-docs-2.8.txt
@@ -387,8 +387,11 @@ other Ubuntu releases.
 
 |Fedora
 |_Not available_
-|LTTng{nbsp}{revision} for Fedora{nbsp}25 and Fedora{nbsp}26 (not
-released yet).
+|LTTng-tools{nbsp}{revision} and LTTng-UST{nbsp}{revision} for
+Fedora{nbsp}25 and Fedora{nbsp}26 (both are not released yet).
+
+<<building-from-source,Build LTTng-modules{nbsp}{revision} from
+source>>.
 
 <<building-from-source,Build LTTng{nbsp}{revision} from source>> for
 other Fedora releases.
@@ -4302,10 +4305,8 @@ Assuming no event record is lost, having only the function addresses on
 entry is enough to create a call graph, since an event record always
 contains the ID of the CPU that generated it.
 +
-You can use a tool like
-https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/binutils/addr2line.html[cmd:addr2line]
-to convert function addresses back to source file names and
-line numbers.
+You can use a tool like man:addr2line(1) to convert function addresses
+back to source file names and line numbers.
 
 * **path:{liblttng-ust-cyg-profile.so}** is a more robust variant
 which also works in use cases where event records might get discarded or