Fix: test: side-effect in assertion

[urcu.git] / urcu-qsbr.c

diff --git a/urcu-qsbr.c b/urcu-qsbr.c
index a35dcfc5aea3674e9747ef69daea0f49def7a972..af82fb7e6d3d6bbe3d6ef199c5c9d23ce9253163 100644 (file)
--- a/urcu-qsbr.c
+++ b/urcu-qsbr.c
@@ -52,7 +52,21 @@
 
 void __attribute__((destructor)) rcu_exit(void);
 
+/*
+ * rcu_gp_lock ensures mutual exclusion between threads calling
+ * synchronize_rcu().
+ */
 static pthread_mutex_t rcu_gp_lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
+/*
+ * rcu_registry_lock ensures mutual exclusion between threads
+ * registering and unregistering themselves to/from the registry, and
+ * with threads reading that registry from synchronize_rcu(). However,
+ * this lock is not held all the way through the completion of awaiting
+ * for the grace period. It is sporadically released between iterations
+ * on the registry.
+ * rcu_registry_lock may nest inside rcu_gp_lock.
+ */
+static pthread_mutex_t rcu_registry_lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
 struct rcu_gp rcu_gp = { .ctr = RCU_GP_ONLINE };
 
 /*
@@ -107,11 +121,28 @@ static void wait_gp(void)
 {
        /* Read reader_gp before read futex */
        cmm_smp_rmb();
-       if (uatomic_read(&rcu_gp.futex) == -1)
-               futex_noasync(&rcu_gp.futex, FUTEX_WAIT, -1,
-                     NULL, NULL, 0);
+       if (uatomic_read(&rcu_gp.futex) != -1)
+               return;
+       while (futex_noasync(&rcu_gp.futex, FUTEX_WAIT, -1,
+                       NULL, NULL, 0)) {
+               switch (errno) {
+               case EWOULDBLOCK:
+                       /* Value already changed. */
+                       return;
+               case EINTR:
+                       /* Retry if interrupted by signal. */
+                       break;  /* Get out of switch. */
+               default:
+                       /* Unexpected error. */
+                       urcu_die(errno);
+               }
+       }
 }
 
+/*
+ * Always called with rcu_registry lock held. Releases this lock between
+ * iterations and grabs it again. Holds the lock when it returns.
+ */
 static void wait_for_readers(struct cds_list_head *input_readers,
                        struct cds_list_head *cur_snap_readers,
                        struct cds_list_head *qsreaders)
@@ -171,6 +202,8 @@ static void wait_for_readers(struct cds_list_head *input_readers,
                        }
                        break;
                } else {
+                       /* Temporarily unlock the registry lock. */
+                       mutex_unlock(&rcu_registry_lock);
                        if (wait_loops >= RCU_QS_ACTIVE_ATTEMPTS) {
                                wait_gp();
                        } else {
@@ -180,6 +213,8 @@ static void wait_for_readers(struct cds_list_head *input_readers,
                                cmm_smp_mb();
 #endif /* #else #ifndef HAS_INCOHERENT_CACHES */
                        }
+                       /* Re-lock the registry lock before the next loop. */
+                       mutex_lock(&rcu_registry_lock);
                }
        }
 }
@@ -233,11 +268,15 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void)
         */
        urcu_move_waiters(&waiters, &gp_waiters);
 
+       mutex_lock(&rcu_registry_lock);
+
        if (cds_list_empty(&registry))
                goto out;
 
        /*
         * Wait for readers to observe original parity or be quiescent.
+        * wait_for_readers() can release and grab again rcu_registry_lock
+        * interally.
         */
        wait_for_readers(&registry, &cur_snap_readers, &qsreaders);
 
@@ -279,6 +318,8 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void)
 
        /*
         * Wait for readers to observe new parity or be quiescent.
+        * wait_for_readers() can release and grab again rcu_registry_lock
+        * interally.
         */
        wait_for_readers(&cur_snap_readers, NULL, &qsreaders);
 
@@ -287,6 +328,7 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void)
         */
        cds_list_splice(&qsreaders, &registry);
 out:
+       mutex_unlock(&rcu_registry_lock);
        mutex_unlock(&rcu_gp_lock);
        urcu_wake_all_waiters(&waiters);
 gp_end:
@@ -339,6 +381,8 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void)
         */
        urcu_move_waiters(&waiters, &gp_waiters);
 
+       mutex_lock(&rcu_registry_lock);
+
        if (cds_list_empty(&registry))
                goto out;
 
@@ -363,6 +407,8 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void)
 
        /*
         * Wait for readers to observe new count of be quiescent.
+        * wait_for_readers() can release and grab again rcu_registry_lock
+        * interally.
         */
        wait_for_readers(&registry, NULL, &qsreaders);
 
@@ -371,6 +417,7 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void)
         */
        cds_list_splice(&qsreaders, &registry);
 out:
+       mutex_unlock(&rcu_registry_lock);
        mutex_unlock(&rcu_gp_lock);
        urcu_wake_all_waiters(&waiters);
 gp_end:
@@ -420,9 +467,11 @@ void rcu_register_thread(void)
        URCU_TLS(rcu_reader).tid = pthread_self();
        assert(URCU_TLS(rcu_reader).ctr == 0);
 
-       mutex_lock(&rcu_gp_lock);
+       mutex_lock(&rcu_registry_lock);
+       assert(!URCU_TLS(rcu_reader).registered);
+       URCU_TLS(rcu_reader).registered = 1;
        cds_list_add(&URCU_TLS(rcu_reader).node, &registry);
-       mutex_unlock(&rcu_gp_lock);
+       mutex_unlock(&rcu_registry_lock);
        _rcu_thread_online();
 }
 
@@ -433,9 +482,11 @@ void rcu_unregister_thread(void)
         * with a waiting writer.
         */
        _rcu_thread_offline();
-       mutex_lock(&rcu_gp_lock);
+       assert(URCU_TLS(rcu_reader).registered);
+       URCU_TLS(rcu_reader).registered = 0;
+       mutex_lock(&rcu_registry_lock);
        cds_list_del(&URCU_TLS(rcu_reader).node);
-       mutex_unlock(&rcu_gp_lock);
+       mutex_unlock(&rcu_registry_lock);
 }
 
 void rcu_exit(void)