X-Git-Url: https://git.liburcu.org/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=urcu.c;h=5e8c6127a8c2f6413d56e95f66eba8c827595c85;hb=25cc6d18cb2fc9964adf2c1edb53c5539e279382;hp=b8e8b422a5941adab6999979736317a29e2d51f9;hpb=f0708810fe66d7fdcf52903c607ed65c9fa664c7;p=urcu.git diff --git a/urcu.c b/urcu.c index b8e8b42..5e8c612 100644 --- a/urcu.c +++ b/urcu.c @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ void __attribute__((constructor)) rcu_init(void); void __attribute__((destructor)) rcu_exit(void); #endif -static pthread_mutex_t rcu_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; +static pthread_mutex_t rcu_gp_lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; int gp_futex; @@ -82,18 +82,18 @@ unsigned int __thread rand_yield; static LIST_HEAD(registry); -static void internal_rcu_lock(void) +static void mutex_lock(pthread_mutex_t *mutex) { int ret; #ifndef DISTRUST_SIGNALS_EXTREME - ret = pthread_mutex_lock(&rcu_mutex); + ret = pthread_mutex_lock(mutex); if (ret) { perror("Error in pthread mutex lock"); exit(-1); } #else /* #ifndef DISTRUST_SIGNALS_EXTREME */ - while ((ret = pthread_mutex_trylock(&rcu_mutex)) != 0) { + while ((ret = pthread_mutex_trylock(mutex)) != 0) { if (ret != EBUSY && ret != EINTR) { printf("ret = %d, errno = %d\n", ret, errno); perror("Error in pthread mutex lock"); @@ -109,27 +109,19 @@ static void internal_rcu_lock(void) #endif /* #else #ifndef DISTRUST_SIGNALS_EXTREME */ } -static void internal_rcu_unlock(void) +static void mutex_unlock(pthread_mutex_t *mutex) { int ret; - ret = pthread_mutex_unlock(&rcu_mutex); + ret = pthread_mutex_unlock(mutex); if (ret) { perror("Error in pthread mutex unlock"); exit(-1); } } -/* - * called with rcu_mutex held. - */ -static void switch_next_rcu_qparity(void) -{ - STORE_SHARED(rcu_gp_ctr, rcu_gp_ctr ^ RCU_GP_CTR_PHASE); -} - #ifdef RCU_MEMBARRIER -static void smp_mb_heavy(void) +static void smp_mb_master(int group) { if (likely(has_sys_membarrier)) membarrier(MEMBARRIER_EXPEDITED); @@ -139,7 +131,7 @@ static void smp_mb_heavy(void) #endif #ifdef RCU_MB -static void smp_mb_heavy(void) +static void smp_mb_master(int group) { smp_mb(); } @@ -189,7 +181,7 @@ static void force_mb_all_readers(void) smp_mb(); /* read ->need_mb before ending the barrier */ } -static void smp_mb_heavy(void) +static void smp_mb_master(int group) { force_mb_all_readers(); } @@ -201,20 +193,35 @@ static void smp_mb_heavy(void) static void wait_gp(void) { /* Read reader_gp before read futex */ - smp_mb_heavy(); + smp_mb_master(RCU_MB_GROUP); if (uatomic_read(&gp_futex) == -1) futex_async(&gp_futex, FUTEX_WAIT, -1, NULL, NULL, 0); } -void wait_for_quiescent_state(void) +void update_counter_and_wait(void) { LIST_HEAD(qsreaders); int wait_loops = 0; struct rcu_reader *index, *tmp; - if (list_empty(®istry)) - return; + /* Switch parity: 0 -> 1, 1 -> 0 */ + STORE_SHARED(rcu_gp_ctr, rcu_gp_ctr ^ RCU_GP_CTR_PHASE); + + /* + * Must commit qparity update to memory before waiting for other parity + * quiescent state. Failure to do so could result in the writer waiting + * forever while new readers are always accessing data (no progress). + * Ensured by STORE_SHARED and LOAD_SHARED. + */ + + /* + * Adding a smp_mb() which is _not_ formally required, but makes the + * model easier to understand. It does not have a big performance impact + * anyway, given this is the write-side. + */ + smp_mb(); + /* * Wait for each thread rcu_reader.ctr count to become 0. */ @@ -223,7 +230,7 @@ void wait_for_quiescent_state(void) if (wait_loops == RCU_QS_ACTIVE_ATTEMPTS) { uatomic_dec(&gp_futex); /* Write futex before read reader_gp */ - smp_mb_heavy(); + smp_mb_master(RCU_MB_GROUP); } list_for_each_entry_safe(index, tmp, ®istry, head) { @@ -235,7 +242,7 @@ void wait_for_quiescent_state(void) if (list_empty(®istry)) { if (wait_loops == RCU_QS_ACTIVE_ATTEMPTS) { /* Read reader_gp before write futex */ - smp_mb_heavy(); + smp_mb_master(RCU_MB_GROUP); uatomic_set(&gp_futex, 0); } break; @@ -253,7 +260,7 @@ void wait_for_quiescent_state(void) if (list_empty(®istry)) { if (wait_loops == RCU_QS_ACTIVE_ATTEMPTS) { /* Read reader_gp before write futex */ - smp_mb_heavy(); + smp_mb_master(RCU_MB_GROUP); uatomic_set(&gp_futex, 0); } break; @@ -263,7 +270,7 @@ void wait_for_quiescent_state(void) wait_gp(); break; /* only escape switch */ case KICK_READER_LOOPS: - smp_mb_heavy(); + smp_mb_master(RCU_MB_GROUP); wait_loops = 0; break; /* only escape switch */ default: @@ -278,35 +285,21 @@ void wait_for_quiescent_state(void) void synchronize_rcu(void) { - internal_rcu_lock(); + mutex_lock(&rcu_gp_lock); + + if (list_empty(®istry)) + goto out; /* All threads should read qparity before accessing data structure - * where new ptr points to. Must be done within internal_rcu_lock - * because it iterates on reader threads.*/ + * where new ptr points to. Must be done within rcu_gp_lock because it + * iterates on reader threads.*/ /* Write new ptr before changing the qparity */ - smp_mb_heavy(); - - switch_next_rcu_qparity(); /* 0 -> 1 */ - - /* - * Must commit qparity update to memory before waiting for parity - * 0 quiescent state. Failure to do so could result in the writer - * waiting forever while new readers are always accessing data (no - * progress). - * Ensured by STORE_SHARED and LOAD_SHARED. - */ - - /* - * Adding a smp_mb() which is _not_ formally required, but makes the - * model easier to understand. It does not have a big performance impact - * anyway, given this is the write-side. - */ - smp_mb(); + smp_mb_master(RCU_MB_GROUP); /* * Wait for previous parity to be empty of readers. */ - wait_for_quiescent_state(); /* Wait readers in parity 0 */ + update_counter_and_wait(); /* 0 -> 1, wait readers in parity 0 */ /* * Must finish waiting for quiescent state for parity 0 before @@ -323,34 +316,17 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void) */ smp_mb(); - switch_next_rcu_qparity(); /* 1 -> 0 */ - - /* - * Must commit qparity update to memory before waiting for parity - * 1 quiescent state. Failure to do so could result in the writer - * waiting forever while new readers are always accessing data (no - * progress). - * Ensured by STORE_SHARED and LOAD_SHARED. - */ - - /* - * Adding a smp_mb() which is _not_ formally required, but makes the - * model easier to understand. It does not have a big performance impact - * anyway, given this is the write-side. - */ - smp_mb(); - /* * Wait for previous parity to be empty of readers. */ - wait_for_quiescent_state(); /* Wait readers in parity 1 */ + update_counter_and_wait(); /* 1 -> 0, wait readers in parity 1 */ /* Finish waiting for reader threads before letting the old ptr being - * freed. Must be done within internal_rcu_lock because it iterates on - * reader threads. */ - smp_mb_heavy(); - - internal_rcu_unlock(); + * freed. Must be done within rcu_gp_lock because it iterates on reader + * threads. */ + smp_mb_master(RCU_MB_GROUP); +out: + mutex_unlock(&rcu_gp_lock); } /* @@ -373,17 +349,17 @@ void rcu_register_thread(void) assert(rcu_reader.need_mb == 0); assert(rcu_reader.ctr == 0); - internal_rcu_lock(); + mutex_lock(&rcu_gp_lock); rcu_init(); /* In case gcc does not support constructor attribute */ list_add(&rcu_reader.head, ®istry); - internal_rcu_unlock(); + mutex_unlock(&rcu_gp_lock); } void rcu_unregister_thread(void) { - internal_rcu_lock(); + mutex_lock(&rcu_gp_lock); list_del(&rcu_reader.head); - internal_rcu_unlock(); + mutex_unlock(&rcu_gp_lock); } #ifdef RCU_MEMBARRIER @@ -392,7 +368,7 @@ void rcu_init(void) if (init_done) return; init_done = 1; - if (!membarrier(MEMBARRIER_EXPEDITED)) + if (!membarrier(MEMBARRIER_EXPEDITED | MEMBARRIER_QUERY)) has_sys_membarrier = 1; } #endif @@ -414,9 +390,9 @@ static void sigrcu_handler(int signo, siginfo_t *siginfo, void *context) * rcu_init constructor. Called when the library is linked, but also when * reader threads are calling rcu_register_thread(). * Should only be called by a single thread at a given time. This is ensured by - * holing the internal_rcu_lock() from rcu_register_thread() or by running at - * library load time, which should not be executed by multiple threads nor - * concurrently with rcu_register_thread() anyway. + * holing the rcu_gp_lock from rcu_register_thread() or by running at library + * load time, which should not be executed by multiple threads nor concurrently + * with rcu_register_thread() anyway. */ void rcu_init(void) {