From f2f8d567679291d581f36a85a09769075d9d8aaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yannick Brosseau Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:11:21 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Don't compare birth time between process structs. We don't always have valid information for it Signed-off-by: Yannick Brosseau --- lttv/modules/gui/controlflow/processlist.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lttv/modules/gui/controlflow/processlist.c b/lttv/modules/gui/controlflow/processlist.c index e5f44a3f..ed775422 100644 --- a/lttv/modules/gui/controlflow/processlist.c +++ b/lttv/modules/gui/controlflow/processlist.c @@ -133,8 +133,10 @@ static gboolean process_list_equ_fct(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b) ret = FALSE; if(likely((pa->pid == 0 && (pa->cpu != pb->cpu)))) ret = FALSE; - if(unlikely(ltt_time_compare(pa->birth, pb->birth) != 0)) - ret = FALSE; + //TODO ybrosseau 2012-09-18 Check if we want to reenable birth comparision + // We currently do not have valid birth info, so don't compare it + /* if(unlikely(ltt_time_compare(pa->birth, pb->birth) != 0)) + ret = FALSE;*/ if(unlikely(pa->trace_num != pb->trace_num)) ret = FALSE; -- 2.34.1