Cleanup: misleading comment about deferrable timer

[lttng-modules.git] / lib / ringbuffer / ring_buffer_iterator.c

diff --git a/lib/ringbuffer/ring_buffer_iterator.c b/lib/ringbuffer/ring_buffer_iterator.c
index 290466f870110ba45b778266a4ccca9b7967407c..c6e5225669de3c044422f8451575fe6004ff655a 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/ringbuffer/ring_buffer_iterator.c
+++ b/lib/ringbuffer/ring_buffer_iterator.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
  */
 
 #include "../../wrapper/ringbuffer/iterator.h"
+#include "../../wrapper/file.h"
 #include <linux/jiffies.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -70,7 +71,7 @@ restart:
                         * Per-CPU buffers rather use a "push" scheme because
                         * the IPI needed to flush all CPU's buffers is too
                         * costly. In the "push" scheme, the reader waits for
-                        * the writer periodic deferrable timer to flush the
+                        * the writer periodic timer to flush the
                         * buffers (keeping track of a quiescent state
                         * timestamp). Therefore, the writer "pushes" data out
                         * of the buffers rather than letting the reader "pull"
@@ -691,7 +692,7 @@ ssize_t lib_ring_buffer_file_read(struct file *filp,
                                  size_t count,
                                  loff_t *ppos)
 {
-       struct inode *inode = filp->f_dentry->d_inode;
+       struct inode *inode = filp->lttng_f_dentry->d_inode;
        struct lib_ring_buffer *buf = inode->i_private;
        struct channel *chan = buf->backend.chan;
 
@@ -716,7 +717,7 @@ ssize_t channel_file_read(struct file *filp,
                          size_t count,
                          loff_t *ppos)
 {
-       struct inode *inode = filp->f_dentry->d_inode;
+       struct inode *inode = filp->lttng_f_dentry->d_inode;
        struct channel *chan = inode->i_private;
        const struct lib_ring_buffer_config *config = &chan->backend.config;