2.6 trace format, lttv 0.12.30

[lttv.git] / doc / developer / lttng-lttv-compatibility.html

diff --git a/doc/developer/lttng-lttv-compatibility.html b/doc/developer/lttng-lttv-compatibility.html
index fb98e9a79df6970978a02c2212fba1fd782d15a7..e4328944bd1d615e55fce3f56a82e485646bb67c 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/developer/lttng-lttv-compatibility.html
+++ b/doc/developer/lttng-lttv-compatibility.html
@@ -3695,6 +3695,9 @@ powerpc64, s390, sparc, sparc64.<br>
 0.12.24<br>
 0.12.25<br>
 0.12.26<br>
+0.12.27<br>
+0.12.28<br>
+0.12.29<br>
 </td>
 <td style="vertical-align: top;">
 0.173<br>
@@ -3717,11 +3720,15 @@ powerpc64, s390, sparc, sparc64.<br>
 0.186o<br>
 0.187<br>
 0.188<br>
+0.189<br>
+0.189o<br>
+0.190<br>
 </td>
 <td style="vertical-align: top;">
 0.76<br>
 0.77<br>
 0.78<br>
+0.79<br>
 </td>
 <td style="vertical-align: top;">
 obsolete<br>
@@ -3772,8 +3779,61 @@ state.c (experienced on a ARM trace).<br>
 LTTng 0.185 coexists peacefully with trace event.<br>
 LTTng 0.186 and 0.186o fixes !CPUFREQ config for arm omap3 tracing.<br>
 LTTng 0.187 and 0.188, for kernel 2.6.32.4, fixes x86-32 apm cpu idle instrumentation.<br>
-LTTng 0.12.26 fixes a backward position seek wrap-around (time underflow) issue
+LTTV 0.12.26 fixes a backward position seek wrap-around (time underflow) issue
 with the detailed event list.<br>
+LTTV 0.12.27, 0.12.28 temporarily disables the new network sync module, which
+causes a build failure on 64-bit.<br>
+ltt-control 0.79 ensures /bin/sh (busybox) script compatibilty.<br>
+LTTV 0.12.29 re-enables the network time alignment (sync/). It's fixed now.<br>
+LTTng 0.189: tree reorganisation in subdirectories, phase 1. Add ARM cpufreq
+trace clock fix.<br>
+LTTng 0.189o: lttng-omap tree, add arm cpufreq trace clock fix.<br>
+LTTng 0.190 fixes net-extended instrumentation alignment on 32-bit architectures.<br>
+</td>
+<td style="vertical-align: top;">
+</td>
+<td style="vertical-align: top;">
+x86, alpha, arm26, avr32, cris, frv, h8300, m32r, m68knommu, parisc, sh, sh64,
+um, v850, xtensa.<br>
+arm, i686, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, x86_64, powerpc 405,
+powerpc64, s390, sparc, sparc64.<br>
+</td>
+</tr>
+
+
+<tr>
+<td style="vertical-align: top;">
+0.12.30<br>
+</td>
+<td style="vertical-align: top;">
+0.191<br>
+</td>
+<td style="vertical-align: top;">
+0.76<br>
+0.77<br>
+0.78<br>
+0.79<br>
+</td>
+<td style="vertical-align: top;">
+obsolete<br>
+</td>
+<td style="vertical-align: top;">
+0.6<br>
+</td>
+<td style="vertical-align: top;">
+obsolete<br>
+</td>
+<td style="vertical-align: top;">
+2.6<br>
+</td>
+<td style="vertical-align: top;">
+2.6.32.4<br>
+</td>
+<td style="vertical-align: top;">
+LTTng 0.191, LTTV 0.12.30 coming with trace format 2.6 revert to the pre-2.4
+behavior for alignment of 64-bit fields on 32-bit architectures. It aligns them
+on 32-bit (maximum alignment is the architecture size). This follows gcc
+behavior.<br>
 </td>
 <td style="vertical-align: top;">
 </td>
@@ -3788,6 +3848,7 @@ powerpc64, s390, sparc, sparc64.<br>
 
 
 
+
 </tbody>
 </table>